<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: nauseous/nauseated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/</link>
	<description>Common usage errors in English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 18:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>indielibrarian:

Your OED seems to be different from mine. Mine has definition 1: Inclined to nausea, and the first reference is 1604, not 1885. Indeed, it is the original meaning of the word. 

This meaning was in use for 300 years before anyone objected to it. If you look through Google Books, you&#039;ll find it frequently used in medical texts.

It is never an error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indielibrarian:</p>
<p>Your OED seems to be different from mine. Mine has definition 1: Inclined to nausea, and the first reference is 1604, not 1885. Indeed, it is the original meaning of the word. </p>
<p>This meaning was in use for 300 years before anyone objected to it. If you look through Google Books, you&#8217;ll find it frequently used in medical texts.</p>
<p>It is never an error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Usagecritic</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Usagecritic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>Really, now, what are we debating?  In speech, be Descriptive.  If everyone understands, is that not the objective?  Language is, if nothing else, organic.  In writing, however, I draw the line.  It&#039;s taken me years of study to write proficiently.  I&#039;ve earned the right to be snobbish and exacting about proper usage and grammar (did I use the preposition correctly?).  So even if you don&#039;t speak no good English, doesn&#039;t mean you have to write like you don&#039;t speak it well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, now, what are we debating?  In speech, be Descriptive.  If everyone understands, is that not the objective?  Language is, if nothing else, organic.  In writing, however, I draw the line.  It&#8217;s taken me years of study to write proficiently.  I&#8217;ve earned the right to be snobbish and exacting about proper usage and grammar (did I use the preposition correctly?).  So even if you don&#8217;t speak no good English, doesn&#8217;t mean you have to write like you don&#8217;t speak it well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 08:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-777</guid>
		<description>@indielibrarian  I find the Oxford Dixtionary of English useful at times, however, I have found some mistakes there too. I have the audio iPad version and it only gives one acceptable version of &quot;short-lived&quot;, the version which has been so misused that it is now considered correct!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@indielibrarian  I find the Oxford Dixtionary of English useful at times, however, I have found some mistakes there too. I have the audio iPad version and it only gives one acceptable version of &#8220;short-lived&#8221;, the version which has been so misused that it is now considered correct!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arparp</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>arparp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 07:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-766</guid>
		<description>The best argument for using nauseated is that that usage of nauseous is not as well-accepted outside the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best argument for using nauseated is that that usage of nauseous is not as well-accepted outside the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Ranly</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Ranly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-752</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad you commented on these two words.  I SELDOM hear them used correctly.

Nice going!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad you commented on these two words.  I SELDOM hear them used correctly.</p>
<p>Nice going!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indielibrarian</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>indielibrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 00:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-688</guid>
		<description>The OED has the following definition for &quot;nauseous:&quot;  Of a person: affected with nausea; having an unsettled stomach; (fig.) disgusted, affected with distaste or loathing.

The first usage of &quot;nauseous&quot; in this way is recorded as 1885, so it is NOT a new usage.  It is perfectly acceptable, therefore, to say, &quot;I feel nauseous.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The OED has the following definition for &#8220;nauseous:&#8221;  Of a person: affected with nausea; having an unsettled stomach; (fig.) disgusted, affected with distaste or loathing.</p>
<p>The first usage of &#8220;nauseous&#8221; in this way is recorded as 1885, so it is NOT a new usage.  It is perfectly acceptable, therefore, to say, &#8220;I feel nauseous.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darken</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Darken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-222</guid>
		<description>True. I suppose my biggest problem is how just weird it sounds to say, &quot;I feel &lt;i&gt;nauseated&lt;/i&gt;. And also how weird it sounds to say, &quot;The smell of rotten eggs is &lt;i&gt;nauseous&lt;/i&gt;.&quot; For each of those respectively I prefer &lt;i&gt;nauseous&lt;/i&gt; and then &lt;i&gt;nauseating&lt;/i&gt;. Also the link I posted seems to have an additional usage note which seems to line up with what you&#039;ve said. 

Usage Note : Traditional critics have insisted that nauseous  is properly used only to mean &quot;causing nausea&quot; and that it is incorrect to use it to mean &quot;affected with nausea,&quot; as in Roller coasters make me nauseous.  In this example, nauseated  is preferred by 72 percent of the Usage Panel. Curiously, though, 88 percent of the Panelists prefer using nauseating  in the sentence The children looked a little green from too many candy apples and nauseating (not nauseous )  rides.  Since there is a lot of evidence to show that nauseous  is widely used to mean &quot;feeling sick,&quot; it appears that people use nauseous  mainly in the sense in which it is considered incorrect. In its &quot;correct&quot; sense it is being supplanted by nauseating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. I suppose my biggest problem is how just weird it sounds to say, &#8220;I feel <i>nauseated</i>. And also how weird it sounds to say, &#8220;The smell of rotten eggs is <i>nauseous</i>.&#8221; For each of those respectively I prefer <i>nauseous</i> and then <i>nauseating</i>. Also the link I posted seems to have an additional usage note which seems to line up with what you&#8217;ve said. </p>
<p>Usage Note : Traditional critics have insisted that nauseous  is properly used only to mean &#8220;causing nausea&#8221; and that it is incorrect to use it to mean &#8220;affected with nausea,&#8221; as in Roller coasters make me nauseous.  In this example, nauseated  is preferred by 72 percent of the Usage Panel. Curiously, though, 88 percent of the Panelists prefer using nauseating  in the sentence The children looked a little green from too many candy apples and nauseating (not nauseous )  rides.  Since there is a lot of evidence to show that nauseous  is widely used to mean &#8220;feeling sick,&#8221; it appears that people use nauseous  mainly in the sense in which it is considered incorrect. In its &#8220;correct&#8221; sense it is being supplanted by nauseating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel V.</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Darken: Thanks for your comments. The &lt;i&gt;nauseous/nauseated&lt;/i&gt; debate is one in which common usage seems to trump correctness. (Think of &lt;i&gt;lie/lay&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;who/whom&lt;/i&gt;. How many people do you know who use these correctly or even understand the differences? Before long, the incorrect versions will be considered correct.) In my copy of &lt;i&gt;The American Heritage Book of English Usage&lt;/i&gt;, 72 percent of the consulting panel (consisting of professionals in writing and speaking professions), preferred &lt;i&gt;nauseated&lt;/i&gt; in a sentence such as &quot;Roller coasters make me nauseous.&quot; However, &lt;em&gt;nauseous&lt;/em&gt; does seem to be winning out overall. Perhaps I should rewrite this entry to reflect the changing views of &lt;i&gt;nauseous&lt;/i&gt; usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darken: Thanks for your comments. The <i>nauseous/nauseated</i> debate is one in which common usage seems to trump correctness. (Think of <i>lie/lay</i> and <i>who/whom</i>. How many people do you know who use these correctly or even understand the differences? Before long, the incorrect versions will be considered correct.) In my copy of <i>The American Heritage Book of English Usage</i>, 72 percent of the consulting panel (consisting of professionals in writing and speaking professions), preferred <i>nauseated</i> in a sentence such as &#8220;Roller coasters make me nauseous.&#8221; However, <em>nauseous</em> does seem to be winning out overall. Perhaps I should rewrite this entry to reflect the changing views of <i>nauseous</i> usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darken</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Darken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-220</guid>
		<description>So &quot;The smell of rotten eggs makes me nauseous.&quot; would work as well. Sorry for all the comments. I tend to to get a lot of afterthoughts. Oh, and sorry if I sound rude. I&#039;m not trying to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8220;The smell of rotten eggs makes me nauseous.&#8221; would work as well. Sorry for all the comments. I tend to to get a lot of afterthoughts. Oh, and sorry if I sound rude. I&#8217;m not trying to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darken</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/word-choice/nauseousnauseated/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Darken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 06:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=57#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Check the usage note. Yeah, this was exactly how I was using  it and it turns out that I wasn&#039;t using it incorrectly after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check the usage note. Yeah, this was exactly how I was using  it and it turns out that I wasn&#8217;t using it incorrectly after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

