<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: who/whom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/</link>
	<description>Common usage errors in English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:18:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobB</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>BobB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-987</guid>
		<description>I agree with the &#039;only&#039; section. That drives me crazy. 

So as to the value of a comma, &quot;My parents, Mother Theresa and the Pope agree that we should attend to our language.&quot;

If nothing is lost in the meaning, i.e., the person understands precisely the intention, the argument over who and whom is a waste of air. However, in a formal setting, it would behoove one to follow the dictates of proper language usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the &#8216;only&#8217; section. That drives me crazy. </p>
<p>So as to the value of a comma, &#8220;My parents, Mother Theresa and the Pope agree that we should attend to our language.&#8221;</p>
<p>If nothing is lost in the meaning, i.e., the person understands precisely the intention, the argument over who and whom is a waste of air. However, in a formal setting, it would behoove one to follow the dictates of proper language usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel V.</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 16:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-806</guid>
		<description>Courtney, thanks for your comment. You are correct in that most of these errors (except for the ones on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grammarerrors.com/category/pronunciation/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pronunciation&lt;/a&gt; page) do refer to written, as opposed to spoken, English. There is certainly more leeway in conversational English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Courtney, thanks for your comment. You are correct in that most of these errors (except for the ones on the <a href="http://www.grammarerrors.com/category/pronunciation/" rel="nofollow">Pronunciation</a> page) do refer to written, as opposed to spoken, English. There is certainly more leeway in conversational English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtney</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-799</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s true. But this site doesn&#039;t seem to be about &quot;real life&quot; since most people speaking English don&#039;t use the correct rules all the time. See? I just started a sentence with the word &quot;but&quot; (a taboo in my English classes). I also put my comma OUTSIDE the quotation marks simply because I like the way it looks better than on the inside. 

The examples given here often do sound strange in the context of normal conversation, but they certainly don&#039;t sound strange to an English teacher who&#039;s grading a paper. Language is always evolving, and for most people &quot;whom&quot; is virtually extinct. However, it is not yet obsolete; and for those who wish to know the difference, the examples are still helpful... if a little awkward when put to use.
(That was riddled with errors I&#039;m sure, haha!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true. But this site doesn&#8217;t seem to be about &#8220;real life&#8221; since most people speaking English don&#8217;t use the correct rules all the time. See? I just started a sentence with the word &#8220;but&#8221; (a taboo in my English classes). I also put my comma OUTSIDE the quotation marks simply because I like the way it looks better than on the inside. </p>
<p>The examples given here often do sound strange in the context of normal conversation, but they certainly don&#8217;t sound strange to an English teacher who&#8217;s grading a paper. Language is always evolving, and for most people &#8220;whom&#8221; is virtually extinct. However, it is not yet obsolete; and for those who wish to know the difference, the examples are still helpful&#8230; if a little awkward when put to use.<br />
(That was riddled with errors I&#8217;m sure, haha!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Beaucoudray</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Beaucoudray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-749</guid>
		<description>That isn&#039;t correct. It&#039;s perfectly acceptable to end a sentence with a preposition when it&#039;s necessary. In fact, it&#039;s considered idiomatic in English.

Where are you? is correct because at isn&#039;t needed.

What are you talking about? is perfectly acceptable. I&#039;ve never heard or read &quot;About what are you talking?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That isn&#8217;t correct. It&#8217;s perfectly acceptable to end a sentence with a preposition when it&#8217;s necessary. In fact, it&#8217;s considered idiomatic in English.</p>
<p>Where are you? is correct because at isn&#8217;t needed.</p>
<p>What are you talking about? is perfectly acceptable. I&#8217;ve never heard or read &#8220;About what are you talking?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel V.</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Marcie, I believe the sentence you asked about should read as follows:

&lt;blockquote&gt;There are 500 graduating students, of &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;whom&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;, 300 are males and 200 are female. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

We&#039;re talking about people, so &lt;em&gt;whom&lt;/em&gt; would be the correct word of choice.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcie, I believe the sentence you asked about should read as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>There are 500 graduating students, of <em><strong>whom</strong></em>, 300 are males and 200 are female. </p></blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;re talking about people, so <em>whom</em> would be the correct word of choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcie</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>marcie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 06:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Which is the correct way of saying things?

There are 500 graduating students.  

A.  of whom, 300 are males and 200 are females.

B. of  which, 300 are males and 200 are females.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is the correct way of saying things?</p>
<p>There are 500 graduating students.  </p>
<p>A.  of whom, 300 are males and 200 are females.</p>
<p>B. of  which, 300 are males and 200 are females.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Orchard</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 22:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-625</guid>
		<description>Even after all of these years, I STILL get this one wrong all of the time. Maybe this will help me finally get it right :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even after all of these years, I STILL get this one wrong all of the time. Maybe this will help me finally get it right <img src='http://www.grammarerrors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.RightUsage</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.RightUsage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 01:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-449</guid>
		<description>I agree with Warsaw on the preposition at the end of a sentence thing. I remember reading that some uptight grammarians around the turn of the century insisted on the eminently absurd rule based on the rules of Latin. I can&#039;t remember their names or why Latin was such a big deal to them (since English is germanic with a Latin influence).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Warsaw on the preposition at the end of a sentence thing. I remember reading that some uptight grammarians around the turn of the century insisted on the eminently absurd rule based on the rules of Latin. I can&#8217;t remember their names or why Latin was such a big deal to them (since English is germanic with a Latin influence).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warsaw Will</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Warsaw Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 19:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-289</guid>
		<description>I teach English to foreigners and your &#039;rules&#039; go contrary to every course book I have seen.

Example 1 - OK, no problem.
Example 2 - Use &#039;whom&#039; after a preposition if you want to be very formal, yes, but when that preposition comes after the verb, use &#039;who&#039;.
Example 3 - &#039;whom I helped&#039; is a defining relative clause. The relative pronoun here is &#039;who&#039; or &#039;that&#039; or nothing. Many native speakers would simply say &#039;The stranded motorist I helped ...&#039;.

I can&#039;t speak for other countries, but if you used these &#039;rules&#039; in Britain, people would wonder what planet or century you had come from. Even something like &#039;to whom should I make the cheque payable&#039; sounds incredibly old fashioned nowadays.

@grammar freak. Churchill, who was a great lover of the English language, deliberately used this expression to show how ridiculous the &#039;don&#039;t end a sentence with a preposition&#039; rule is. Have you actually ever heard anyone say &#039;About whom are you talking&#039;? In real life, I mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I teach English to foreigners and your &#8216;rules&#8217; go contrary to every course book I have seen.</p>
<p>Example 1 &#8211; OK, no problem.<br />
Example 2 &#8211; Use &#8216;whom&#8217; after a preposition if you want to be very formal, yes, but when that preposition comes after the verb, use &#8216;who&#8217;.<br />
Example 3 &#8211; &#8216;whom I helped&#8217; is a defining relative clause. The relative pronoun here is &#8216;who&#8217; or &#8216;that&#8217; or nothing. Many native speakers would simply say &#8216;The stranded motorist I helped &#8230;&#8217;.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak for other countries, but if you used these &#8216;rules&#8217; in Britain, people would wonder what planet or century you had come from. Even something like &#8216;to whom should I make the cheque payable&#8217; sounds incredibly old fashioned nowadays.</p>
<p>@grammar freak. Churchill, who was a great lover of the English language, deliberately used this expression to show how ridiculous the &#8216;don&#8217;t end a sentence with a preposition&#8217; rule is. Have you actually ever heard anyone say &#8216;About whom are you talking&#8217;? In real life, I mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: betshy</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/whowhom/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>betshy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 00:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=218#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Great material! thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great material! thanks <img src='http://www.grammarerrors.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

