<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GrammarErrors.com &#187; Grammar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grammarerrors.com/category/grammar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com</link>
	<description>Common usage errors in English</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>different from/different than</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/different-from-than/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/different-from-than/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/?p=598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read this sentence recently in a book, and it immediately struck me as awkward and incorrect. Curiosity is different than other ways of being fulfilled&#8230; Shouldn&#8217;t it be &#8220;different from&#8220;? Different from, different than&#8230;what&#8217;s the difference (pardon the pun)? The word than is a preposition that usually follows an adjective when making a comparison [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this sentence recently in a book, and it immediately struck me as awkward and incorrect.</p>
<blockquote><p>Curiosity is different <strong>than</strong> other ways of being fulfilled&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t it be <em>&#8220;different from</em>&#8220;?</p>
<p><span id="more-598"></span>Different from, different than&#8230;what&#8217;s the difference (pardon the pun)?</p>
<p>The word <em>than</em> is a preposition that usually follows an adjective when making a comparison between people, items, or conditions. Examples include <em>more than,</em> <em>less than</em>, <em>better than</em>, <em>worse than</em>, <em>colder than</em>,<em> sweeter than</em>—you get the idea.</p>
<p>However, <em>different than</em> can also be correctly used in a sentence such as the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>College life is different <strong>than</strong> I expected.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, what is the distinction between this example and the first one that uses <em>different than</em> incorrectly?  A clause instead of a noun follows the word <em>different</em>.</p>
<p><strong>General Guideline:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>If a noun follows <em>different</em>, use <em>from</em>:<br />
Curiosity is <em>different from</em> other ways of being fulfilled&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>If a clause (has a subject and verb) follows <em>different</em>, use <em>than</em>:<br />
College life is <em>different than</em> I expected.</p></blockquote>
<p>See also Dictionary.com&#8217;s explanation:<br />
<a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/help/faq/language/g02.html" target="_blank">How do I know when to use different from, different than, different to?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/different-from-than/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>aren&#8217;t I/am I not</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/arent-iam-i-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/arent-iam-i-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The expression aren&#8217;t I is often used in place of am I not, particularly in conversational speech. Example 1 (incorrect usage): I&#8217;m going with you on vacation, aren&#8217;t I? Although the use of this phrase is widespread, it is atrocious English that could be considered equivalent to you is, a phrase which most educated people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The expression <i>aren&#8217;t I</i> is often used in place of <i>am I not</i>, particularly in conversational speech.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Example 1 (incorrect usage)</b>: I&#8217;m going with you on vacation, <i>aren&#8217;t I</i>?</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-187"></span></p>
<p>Although the use of this phrase is widespread, it is atrocious English that could be considered equivalent to <i>you is</i>, a phrase which most educated people abhor (although for some reason, these same people have no qualms about saying <i>aren&#8217;t I</i>). The correct form of the sentence in Example 1 is as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p><b>Example 2 (correct usage)</b>: I&#8217;m going with you on vacation, <i>am I not</i>?</p></blockquote>
<p>If you read this sentence aloud, it probably sounds awkward and formal, perhaps even a bit hoity-toity. However, it is correct English. If the phrase <i>aren&#8217;t I</i> is converted from a question to a statement, <i>I aren&#8217;t</i>, it becomes obvious that it is indeed grammatically incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/arent-iam-i-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>drug/dragged</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/drugdragged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/drugdragged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drug is often used as the past tense of drag, as in the following example: Example: I drug myself out of bed this morning. The past tense of drag is actually dragged, not drug. This error is particularly common in speech. Even Bill Clinton once made this blunder on national television, returning to bad habits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drug is often used as the past tense of drag, as in the following example:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Example:</strong> I <em>drug</em> myself out of bed this morning.</p></blockquote>
<p>The past tense of <em>drag</em> is actually <em>dragged</em>, not <em>drug</em>. This error is particularly common in speech. Even Bill Clinton once made this blunder on national television, returning to bad habits he developed as a youth growing up in Arkansas.</p>
<p>Remember that the word <em>drug</em> should never be associated with any kind of pulling action. It should only be used when referring to some type of medicinal substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/drugdragged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>good/well</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/goodwell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/goodwell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When asked, &#8220;How are you doing?&#8221; many people will immediately answer, &#8220;I am doing good.&#8221; Unless they’re talking about the good they’re doing for their community, they should have answered instead with &#8220;I am doing well.&#8221; Good and well in the context illustrated above are no doubt two very commonly confused words. Good is an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When asked, &#8220;How are you doing?&#8221; many people will immediately answer, &#8220;I am doing good.&#8221; Unless they’re talking about the good they’re doing for their community, they should have answered instead with &#8220;I am doing well.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>Good</em> and <em>well</em> in the context illustrated above are no doubt two very commonly confused words. <em>Good</em> is an adjective (and a noun in some cases); <em>well</em> can be an adjective or an adverb, but in most cases, it is used as an adverb. In the example sentence, <em>well</em> should be used because an adverb is needed to modify the verb <em>doing</em>. <em>Good</em> is not the most appropriate word to use in this context because adjectives cannot modify verbs.</p>
<p><span id="more-192"></span></p>
<p>Perhaps you&#8217;ve also wondered, &#8220;What about &#8216;I am feeling <em>good</em> &#8216;? Is this correct, or is it &#8216;I am feeling <em>well</em>&#8216;?&#8221; Here’s where it can get tricky. Both are correct. But isn’t <em>feeling</em> a verb? Yes, but it is a linking verb. Linking verbs are different from other verbs in that they are not performing an action, but are connecting the subject with another word in the sentence. In both sentences, <em>feeling</em> links <em>good</em> and <em>well</em> back to the subject <em>I</em>. <em>Good</em> and <em>well</em> are not adverbs modifying the verb <em>feeling</em>; rather, they are adjectives modifying <em>I</em>, the subject of the sentence. Note that the meanings conveyed are different (<em>feeling good</em> refers to a state of mind; <em>feeling well</em> refers to health), but both are grammatically correct. The same is true when used with other linking verbs such as <em>look</em>. (You <em>look </em>good. You <em>look</em> well.) Looking good refers to attractiveness; looking well refers to health.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>In a nutshell:</strong></p>
<p><em>Good:</em> always an adjective, never an adverb; never modifies a verb but can follow a linking verb and act as a modifier for the subject.</p>
<p><em>Well:</em> adjective or adverb depending on context. When an action verb is involved, an adverb is needed, and <em>well</em> is always the choice, never <em>good</em>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/goodwell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>irregular verbs</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/irregular-verbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/irregular-verbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are approximately 200 irregular verbs in the English language. These verbs form the past and past participle (have + verb) tenses differently from the present. These irregularities can be a nagging source of confusion for many writers and speakers of English. Below is a handful of irregular verbs that seem to be most frequently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are approximately 200 irregular verbs in the English language. These verbs form the past and past participle (have + verb) tenses differently from the present. These irregularities can be a nagging source of confusion for many writers and speakers of English.</p>
<p><span id="more-195"></span>Below is a handful of irregular verbs that seem to be most frequently misused (even by the educated among us. <em>Tsk tsk</em>). Most English handbooks should have a complete listing of all 200 or so of these verbs.</p>
<table class="table" border="0" width="100%" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th width="11%">Present</th>
<th width="9%">Past</th>
<th width="23%">Past Participle</th>
<th width="57%" align="left">Examples of Incorrect Usage</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">come</td>
<td align="center">came</td>
<td align="center">(have) come</td>
<td>I <em>have came</em> too early. (have come)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">drink</td>
<td align="center">drank</td>
<td align="center">(have) drunk</td>
<td>They <em>have drank</em> too much wine. (have drunk)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">go</td>
<td align="center">went</td>
<td align="center">(have) gone</td>
<td>She <em>has went</em> to work. (has gone)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">ride</td>
<td align="center">rode</td>
<td align="center">(have) ridden</td>
<td>I <em>have rode</em> a bike since I was 10. (have ridden)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">run</td>
<td align="center">ran</td>
<td align="center">(have) run</td>
<td>I <em>have ran</em> four miles. (have run)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">see</td>
<td align="center">saw</td>
<td align="center">(have) seen</td>
<td>I <em>seen</em> the accident as it was happening. (have seen)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">speak</td>
<td align="center">spoke</td>
<td align="center">(have) spoken</td>
<td>We <em>have spoke</em> on the phone. (have spoken)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">write</td>
<td align="center">wrote</td>
<td align="center">(have) written</td>
<td>I <em>have wrote</em> a letter. (have written)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/irregular-verbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>less/fewer</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/lessfewer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/lessfewer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Less and fewer have essentially the same meaning, but they are used differently according to what they modify. Less is used with mass nouns, while fewer is used with count nouns. Look at the following example: Example (less-correct usage): There is less milk than juice in the refrigerator. In the example sentence above, milk does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Less</em> and <em>fewer</em> have essentially the same meaning, but they are used differently according to what they modify. <em>Less</em> is used with mass nouns, while <em>fewer</em> is used with count nouns. Look at the following example:</p>
<p><span id="more-198"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Example (<em>less</em>-correct usage):</strong> There is <em>less</em> milk than juice in the refrigerator.</p></blockquote>
<p>In the example sentence above, milk does not consist of an amount that can actually be counted, so <em>less</em> is the appropriate word to use. This type of sentence rarely causes any problems for English speakers. However, in a sentence such as, &#8220;There are fewer people in class today than there were yesterday,&#8221; a great deal of confusion arises over what is correct. Many people would be tempted to say, &#8220;There are <em>less</em> people in class today than there were yesterday.&#8221; But remember that if the objects can be counted, always use <em>fewer</em>, not <em>less</em>. People in a class can be counted, so <em>fewer</em> is the correct choice for this sentence.</p>
<p><!--LIE/LAY--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/lessfewer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>lie/lay</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/lielay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/lielay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lie and lay are two words that seem to cause some of the greatest confusion, even among those versed in English grammar. Lie means to recline; lay, on the other hand, means to put or place something.Lay is a transitive verb, meaning that there is always an object after it. (Lay the book on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lie</i> and <i>lay</i> are two words that seem to cause some of the greatest confusion, even among those versed in English grammar. <i>Lie</i> means to recline; <i>lay</i>, on the other hand, means to put or place something.<i>Lay</i> is a transitive verb, meaning that there is always an object after it. (Lay the book on the shelf. <i>Book</i> is the object.) The principal parts of <i>lie</i> and <i>lay</i> are listed below.</p>
<blockquote><p><b>lie</b>: lie, lying, lay, (have) lain<br />
<b>lay</b>: lay, laying, laid, (have) laid</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-202"></span></p>
<p>The confusion generally seems to occur with the forms of <i>lie</i>. The following sentences illustrate the correct and incorrect uses of <i>lay</i> and <i>lie</i>.</p>
<blockquote>
<dl>
<dt><b>lie/lay</b></dt>
<dd>I <i>lie</i> [not <i>lay</i>] on the floor when I watch television.</dd>
<dd>I <i>lay</i> my keys on the table when I arrive home from work.</dd>
<dt><b>lying/laying</b></dt>
<dd>I am <i>lying</i> [not <i>laying</i>] on the floor watching television.</dd>
<dd>I am laying my briefcase on my desk to remind me that I have work to                         finish.</dd>
<dt><b>lay/laid</b></dt>
<dd>Yesterday I <i>lay</i> [not <i>laid</i>] in bed all day with a fever.</dd>
<dd>Yesterday I <i>laid</i> my briefcase on my desk and forgot about it when I left for work.</dd>
<dt><b>(have) lain/(have) laid</b></dt>
<dd>I <i>have lain</i> [not <i>have laid</i>] in bed all day with a fever.</dd>
<dd>I <i>have laid</i> my briefcase on my desk to remind me that I have work to finish.</dd>
</dl>
</blockquote>
<p>Although these are two extremely confusing verbs, with a little practice, you should have them down pat. Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t know of any helpful hints to use for remembering how to use <i>lie</i> and <i>lay</i> correctly. My only suggestion is to memorize them and practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/lielay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>like/as though/as if</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/likeas-thoughas-if/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/likeas-thoughas-if/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 18:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The word like should never be used before a clause. Example 1 (incorrect usage): It looks like it will rain. Like should only be used before a noun, as in the following example: Example 2 (correct usage): The girl looks like her mother. Take a close look at the two sentences above. Do you see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word <em>like</em> should never be used before a <a onclick="return popup(this, 'clause')" href="glossary/clause.html">clause</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Example 1 (incorrect usage)</strong>: It looks <em>like</em> it will rain.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Like</em> should only be used before a noun, as in the following example:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Example 2 (correct usage)</strong>: The girl looks <em>like</em> her mother.</p></blockquote>
<p>Take a close look at the two sentences above. Do you see the difference in how they are used? In the first sentence, <em>like</em> is followed by the clause <em>it will rain</em>. In the second sentence, <em>like</em> is followed by <em>her mother</em>. Whenever a subject and verb follow, remember to substitute <em>like</em> with either <em>as though</em> or <em>as if</em>, as illustrated in the final example below.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Example 3 (correct)</strong>: It looks <em>as if</em> it will rain.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/likeas-thoughas-if/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>only: misplaced modifier</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/only-as-a-misplaced-modifier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/only-as-a-misplaced-modifier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The adverb only should be placed as close as possible to the word it modifies in a sentence. Consider the following two sentences: Example 1: The band only sang five songs at the concert. Example 2: The band sang only five songs at the concert. Example 1 indicates that the band sang, rather than played, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The adverb <em>only</em> should be placed as close as possible to the word it modifies in a sentence. Consider the following two sentences:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Example 1:</strong> The band <em>only</em> sang five songs at the concert.</p>
<p><strong>Example 2:</strong> The band sang <em>only</em> five songs at the concert.</p></blockquote>
<p>Example 1 indicates that the band sang, rather than played, five songs. The sentence in Example 2 indicates that the band sang five songs, rather than eight or ten or any other number. There is a distinct difference in meaning. However, it is common for <em>only</em> to be misplaced in a sentence, making the meaning of the sentence ambiguous.</p>
<p><span id="more-209"></span></p>
<p>A similar error was made with the popular old song called &#8220;I Only Have Eyes for You.&#8221; The writers of this song would have made the message clearer by writing &#8220;I Have Eyes for Only You.&#8221; But then again, the song just wouldn&#8217;t sound the same had the lyrics been written to be grammatically correct. Regardless, when using <em>only</em> in your own speaking and writing, remember to place it as close as possible to the word you are modifying so the meaning of the sentence is clear to the audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/only-as-a-misplaced-modifier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>real/really</title>
		<link>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/realreally/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/realreally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel V.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grammar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grammarerrors.com/wordpress/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Real is often used in place of really, most often in conversational English. Example 1 (incorrect usage): I am real tired today. Example 2 (correct usage): I am really tired today. Although this error is somewhat acceptable in informal conversation, it is actually incorrect and should never be used in writing. The reason that real [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Real</em> is often used in place of <em>really</em>, most often in conversational English.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Example 1 (incorrect usage)</strong>: I am <em>real</em> tired today.</p>
<p><strong>Example 2 (correct usage)</strong>: I am <em>really</em> tired today.</p></blockquote>
<p>Although this error is somewhat acceptable in informal conversation, it is actually incorrect and should never be used in writing. The reason that <em>real</em> is incorrect when used this way is simple: <em>Real</em> is an adjective, and as you can see in the first example above, <em>real</em> is incorrectly used as an adverb. In the example, <em>real</em> is describing <em>tired</em>, which is an adjective, so the adverb <em>really</em> is needed to make the sentence correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grammarerrors.com/grammar/realreally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
